# Inspect the fictional Word redline

This bundle demonstrates a first-pass review on a one-page English pilot agreement. No customer data, account or network access is required for the example.

1. Open `examples/incoming.docx`. Clause 2 gives the buyer three business days. Keep this original unchanged.
2. Open `examples/review-copy.docx`. In Word, choose Review and display all markup and comments. Find the deleted “three”, inserted “ten” and the REVIEW-01 comment. Find the second comment, HOLD-01, attached to the original renewal clause.
3. Save two disposable copies. Reject both revisions in one copy and confirm clause 2 reads “three business days”. Accept both in the other and confirm it reads “ten business days”. Check clause 1, its table and the full renewal clause against the original. Comments are a separate review item.
4. With Python 3 installed, run `python3 verify_sample.py` from the extracted folder. It compares the fixed pair using the standard library, without modifying either document. Success begins with `PASS: one replacement, two anchored comments`. A failed check exits with an error.

`examples/review-notes.md` records each decision. `SKILL.md` and the three references guide a reviewer adapting this pattern with an approved editor and playbook. The verifier is limited to these fixture files. The example was assembled offline and inspected structurally and visually. It was not generated by a live Claude run or tested on client agreements.

[Microsoft instructions for accepting or rejecting revisions](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/word/accept-or-reject-tracked-changes-in-word)