# Lantern Works renewal review

Prepared October 5, 2026. Renewal is due December 4, 60 days away (R1).

**Priority: Owner review.** Active seats went from 12/20 (60%) to 8/20 (40%) over two comparable weeks, a fall of 20 percentage points (U1, U2). The sponsor is unconfirmed (S1). These observations meet the example Owner review rule. The cause of the usage change and the renewal decision are unknown.

| Owner | Due | Action | Completion evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Adoption lead | October 12 | Check whether the count reflects a usage change or a reporting issue | Reconciled counts and a dated finding, or a named open question |
| CSM | October 12 | Confirm the current renewal decision owner | Role and confirmation date recorded |
| CS lead | October 19 | If the sponsor is still unknown, review the gap with the CSM | Named owner and next internal review date |

Dates and owners follow the fictional team's scheduling input (P1). The CSM checks the contract, sources and proposed tasks before creating them. No renewal probability or customer message is part of this output.