A Claude Skill that takes a hiring manager’s loose role description (“we need a senior backend engineer for the payments team”), interviews the manager about the actual scope, and produces a structured job description aligned to skills-based hiring principles plus employer brand voice. Replaces the typical “we’ll write the JD when we get to it” pattern with a 20-minute conversation that produces a usable JD.
What you’ll need
- Claude Code or Claude.ai with custom Skills enabled
- The team’s employer brand voice guide (or examples of well-written existing JDs)
- The role’s pay range and any compliance requirements (US: pay-transparency-required jurisdictions need specific disclosure)
Setup
- Drop the Skill. Place
jd-writer.skillinto your Claude Code skills directory. The Skill exposes one callable function:draft_jd. - Configure the brand voice. Edit
brand_voice.mdwith your company’s JD voice guidelines and 2-3 well-written existing JDs as references. - Configure compliance rules.
compliance_rules.yamlincludes per-jurisdiction requirements (pay disclosure, EEO statements, accommodation language). - Test on a known role. Run on a role where a JD already exists. Compare the Skill’s draft to the existing JD; tune the brand voice and required-sections config.
How it works
The Skill conducts a 5-10 minute conversation:
- Discovers the actual role. Asks the manager about scope, success criteria 12 months in, the team context, must-have vs nice-to-have skills, the day-to-day, the hard parts.
- Probes for skills-based hiring alignment. Pushes back on credential-based requirements (“5+ years at FAANG”) in favor of skill-based articulation (“experience designing distributed systems serving 10M+ requests/day”).
- Drafts the JD. Aligned to the brand voice, compliance-checked for the target jurisdictions, structured per the team’s standard JD format.
Output
A complete JD draft including:
- Role summary — 2-3 sentences on what the role does and why it matters
- What you’ll do — the actual day-to-day, prioritized
- What we’re looking for — skill-based requirements with explicit must-have vs nice-to-have split
- About the team — team context, who the candidate works with, what the team is building
- About the company — company context aligned to employer brand
- Compensation and benefits — pay range, equity, benefits summary, location/remote details
- Compliance footer — EEO statement, accommodation language per jurisdiction
Where it fits
Use this Skill at the start of every new role — replacing the usual “we’ll write the JD this week” delay that pushes hiring back. Hiring manager spends 15-20 minutes in the conversation; recruiter reviews the draft, edits, posts.
The downstream benefits compound: better JDs produce better-fit applicant pools, which produces better hire outcomes per recruiting funnel metrics.
Watch-outs
- Brand voice quality matters. Generic Claude defaults produce generic JDs. Investing in the brand-voice config pays back across every JD.
- Don’t auto-publish. Recruiter and hiring manager both review before posting. AI-drafted JDs can introduce subtle errors (wrong title, wrong jurisdiction, wrong scope) that need human catch.
- Compliance is jurisdiction-specific. US states (California, Colorado, NY) have pay-transparency requirements; EU has different requirements. Verify the config matches your hiring jurisdictions.
- Push back on credential-laden requirements. The Skill should challenge “must have CS degree” and “must have 10+ years experience” framings; verify it actually does in your config.
- Length discipline. JDs over 600 words get skim-read; force concision. The Skill should target ~400 words for most roles.