Reevo

What it is

Reevo sells itself as a “revenue operating system”: one AI-native platform that holds the CRM record, finds and enriches prospects, sends sequences, dials, records and summarizes meetings, updates deals and forecasts, all on the same data. The modules are not sold separately. The product groups them as Find (TAM sourcing, enrichment, web research, inbound form routing), Connect (domain purchase, inbox warming, sequences, a native dialer, scheduling), Sell (meeting prep, call recording, transcription, meeting intelligence), Manage (automatic deal updates, forecasting, reporting) and Foundation (the CRM itself, custom objects, no-code workflows, one-click migration, and Ask Reevo, a cited-answer assistant that also works in Slack).

The company was founded by four operators with shared DoorDash history (David Zhu, Cindy Hao, Curtis Tan, Clement Fang), launched in November 2025 with an $80M round co-led by Khosla Ventures and Kleiner Perkins, and in July 2026 bought Ciro, a prospecting agent, to fold its search and qualification into Reevo’s enrichment and lead scoring. It is independent and VC-backed; there is no acquisition or shutdown news as of November 2026.

The question it answers

The buyer question behind Reevo is blunt: can one platform replace HubSpot or Salesforce, Outreach, a parallel dialer, Gong and ZoomInfo, or is that a consolidation pitch you will regret? Reevo’s answer is “yes, or partly”. Its site pushes a full switch, with migration tooling and “Salesforce alternative” pages, but also says it works alongside the tools you already run. That hedge matters, because the two buys have very different risk profiles.

The AI model is supervised rather than autonomous by default. Reevo drafts follow-ups and CRM field updates for the rep to approve, edit or dismiss, and an action type that gets approved repeatedly graduates to running on its own. That is a more conservative design than agent-per-account products like Rox, and it is the right default for a team handing its system of record to a two-year-old vendor.

Pricing reality

Quote-only. The pricing page (stamped “updated Aug 1, 2026”, checked 9 November 2026) names three plans and lists no dollar figure on any of them; every tier is “Talk to a human”, and there is no free plan or self-serve trial.

• Core — 1,000 enrichment credits, 1,000 dialer minutes and 2,500 recorded meeting minutes per user per month; 50 active sequences per org; 20,000 workflow credits per org per month; 48-hour email support.
• Pro — doubles enrichment and dialer minutes (2,000 each), 4,000 meeting minutes, 100 active sequences, unlimited reports and dashboards, 40,000 workflow credits, 24-hour SLA and a shared Slack channel.
• Enterprise — custom.

Seat caps are unsettled. Earlier versions of the page capped Core at 5 users, and a third-party review still lists Core at 5 and Pro at 10; a pricing tracker logged the seat caps being removed in July 2026. Ask for the cap in writing. A startup program offers reduced pricing to qualifying companies.

No credible per-seat contract data is public yet, so budget against what Reevo would displace. Using the figures on ooligo’s own pages for a 10-rep team: HubSpot Sales Pro at $90/seat/month on annual is about $10,800 plus a $1,500 onboarding fee; Outreach Core at a reported ~$100-120/seat/month is $12,000-14,400; Gong at ~$1,400-2,000/seat/year plus a platform fee is $19,000-25,000. That is roughly $43,000-52,000 a year before a data vendor or a parallel dialer. Reevo’s pitch only works if the quote lands well under that number and the per-user allowances (dialer minutes and enrichment credits especially) cover your real usage. A team running a power dialer will burn 1,000 minutes per rep in a week or two.

Best for

RevOps leaders and founders at seed-to-Series-B B2B companies, roughly 5-50 GTM seats, that are either buying their first real CRM or running a light HubSpot instance alongside four or more point tools, and that want prospecting, outreach, calls and pipeline on one record. The specific use case where it earns its keep: an AE- or founder-led motion where the same person prospects, calls, runs the meeting and updates the deal, so that one shared record removes most of the re-keying.

Skip it if you run Salesforce with CPQ, complex territories or heavy custom objects (Reevo’s custom-object limits are 5 on Core and 10 on Pro), if you need mature quoting and contract management, or if your gap is high-volume outbound only. A sequencer is a cheaper fix for that.

Versus the alternatives

• Salesforce and HubSpot, the two largest CRMs by share, are the default when you need ecosystem depth, admin talent you can hire, and AI (Agentforce, Breeze) added inside a platform you already own. Pick them when the CRM must survive your next three reorganizations.
• Aurasell is the closest like-for-like: another AI-native consolidation platform, but with a published $15,000/year startup floor. Pick it when you want a list price to anchor negotiation.
• Rox is the fastest-growing entrant in the agentic segment and takes the opposite stance. It layers agents on top of Salesforce or HubSpot instead of replacing them. Pick Rox when ripping out the CRM is off the table.
• Day.ai, Attio and Lightfield are AI-native CRMs without the bundled dialer and sequencer. Pick one of them when you want a modern system of record and are happy keeping Outreach or Apollo for engagement.

For the category framing, see agentic CRM.

Watch-outs

• Consolidation is a single point of failure. Your CRM record, dialer, sequences and call recordings all sit with one young vendor. Guard: negotiate a full data export (objects, activities, recordings and transcripts) into the contract, and run a test export during the pilot, not at renewal.
• Per-user allowances become hidden overage. Dialer minutes, enrichment credits and workflow credits are capped per user or per org, and the page does not publish overage rates. Guard: pull 90 days of dial minutes and enrichment lookups from your current tools, size the plan against the 80th-percentile rep, and get overage pricing in writing.
• The product is still filling in. Intent signals, lead scoring, coaching insights and the command center were marked “soon” on the pricing page, and early reviewers flag occasional bugs and thin quoting for larger organizations. Guard: buy only what ships today, and pilot with one pod for one full quarter against your current stack’s pipeline and activity baseline before migrating everyone.
• Thin public evidence. G2 carries a handful of reviews and there are no published customer counts. Guard: ask for two reference customers at your size who migrated off HubSpot or Salesforce, and talk to their RevOps owner, not their CEO.

Security is in order for a company this age: SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, a 2026 pen test summary including an AI pen test, SSO and RBAC, hosted on AWS, with documents on request through its SafeBase trust center.